Let me explain... Today, I own six of Joe Bonamassa's LPs, but until a few years ago I had never heard of him. Then one day I was at home alone for a weekend as I was tasked with swapping Joel's bedroom with our office which involved a lot of decorating, installing shelves & moving furniture etc.
Whilst busy with that, I was streaming a UK rock station, and in the middle of one of their 30 minute non-stop segments I had to stop and just listen to one particular track that blew me away.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90908/9090835c1b7344cc99a791761989b2fb18655e86" alt=""
The question then is this: was it really so bad to illegally download his stuff?
If I hadn't, I doubt very much I would own so many of his albums today. Though I should add that I have replaced all my illegal downloads with bona-fide ones. However, it was those downloads that led directly to some album sales for the artist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3524b/3524bd71317502d95ab8b6b70dabd5ad8506020f" alt=""
I guess to a certain extent that downloading from YouTube etc is the 21st Century equivalent of home taping which was apparently killing music back in the day. Yes, I know it's illegal, but it's also a great way to explore the online world of music and check out whether a band is worth investing in or not. Or am I just trying to justify criminal behaviour?
For a free & completely legal Bonamassa download visit his website.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment, we really appreciate it!
Anyone can comment and all comments will appear after word verification.
Spam will be dealt with appropriately.
(Apologies for the temporary glitch of being unable to reply directly to comments, I'm working on this)
Cheers